“What’s also important, but not evident, on this chart is that Obama’s major expenses were temporary (the stimulus is over now) while Bush’s were, effectively, recurring. The Bush tax cuts didn’t just lower revenue for 10 years. It’s clear now that they lowered it indefinitely, which means this chart is understating their true cost. Similarly, the Medicare drug benefit is costing money on perpetuity, not just for two or three years. And Boehner, Ryan and others voted for these laws and, in some cases, helped to craft and pass them.”
Related Posts
How much did the bush tax cuts cost?
- admin
- June 7, 2011
- 0
2.5 trillion dollars. roughly 4 times the stimulus cost (after accounting for the additional tax revenue generated), which created more than 3 million jobs. What […]
The yahoo cesspool – yahoo answers is a dung pile
- admin
- November 17, 2010
- 0
Yahoo.com is literally swamped with dumb people, parroting right wing talking points. Its the new AOL. On yahoo answers, we are treated with 90%+ garbage […]
Biggest Loser, Eric Cantor?
- admin
- October 23, 2009
- 0
Virginia, please do your part to prevent this guy’s mental illness from representing your state in the future. Earlier today, Cantor grandstanded trying to make […]